Tuesday, May 1, 2012

VOA News: USA: Caregivers, Chronically Ill Under More Stress

VOA News: USA
USA Voice of America
Caregivers, Chronically Ill Under More Stress
May 1st 2012, 18:57

Americans are under considerable stress, according to a new survey by the American Psychological Association.

<!--AV-->

Nearly half of the respondents reported an increase in stress over the last five years. 

While money, work and the economy were cited as the major causes, stress levels were particularly acute among people with chronic diseases or those caring for aging or chronically ill family members.

Caregivers report higher levels of stress, poorer health and a greater tendency to engage in unhealthy behaviors to alleviate their stress than the general public.

When Jillian Downs was pregnant she got some bad news. Her baby had cystic fibrosis, a genetic disease that causes sticky thick mucus to build up in the lungs and create life-threating infections. It also complicates the digestive system making it more difficult for the body to absorb nutrients and food.

Life expectation at the time was 32, Downs' age.

Now, seven years later her daughter Ava begins her day in a big stuffed chair in the living room. She buckles up a special electric vest, that gently inflates and deflates. The pressure works loose any mucus in her lungs. Ava does the vest therapy twice a day, every day.<!--IMAGE-LEFT-->

Downs says it has become a routine, as have other daily prescribed medications such as inhalants and dozens of pills including enzyme capsules before every meal and snack. "This is what we know. This is what she knows."

But there's a whole list of other concerns, says Ava's father Philip, "We need to pay attention to her diet, her weight, her hydration, monitor her vitamin D levels and extra vitamins."

Caring for loved one

Jillian and Philip Downs are among millions of caregivers in the United States, who manage children with special needs, or aging or chronically ill family members. And that number is likely to grow as the number of older Americans is expected to double by 2030, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

For Suzanne Mintz, caregiving is her whole life. "I have it in my day job and I have it at home."

Mintz is president of the National Family Caregivers Association, an advocacy and support organization she founded not long after her husband Steven was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis in the early 1990s.

Her life didn't change much in the beginning, but over the years and her husband's condition worsened, she had to do more. Now she helps him get out of bed, shower, dress, eat and move in and out of a wheel chair. Mintz says it hasn't been easy on their marriage.

"I haven't always dealt with it. I've had serious depression several times. But I think we finally learned how to deal with each other."<!--IMAGE-LEFT-->

Mintz says things improved once she realized that asking for help wasn't a sign of weakness, but simply recognition that she couldn't do everything on her own. "I just think that it's absolutely important to get help. Some people have a hard time asking for it, I understand that, but sooner or later you have to for multiple reasons."

Steven Mintz adds, that the other side of it has been accepting help, "which hasn't been easy."

Support Network

They both agree that it is important to deal directly with one's stress, an idea underscored by a panel of experts at the release of the annual American Psychological Association Stress in America survey.

One of the experts was Katherine Nordal, who specializes in the treatment of stress-related disorders says caregivers do better when they are plugged into a support system.

"The caregiver group seems to be much, much better when they are plugged into some sort of a support system. They demonstrate less isolation, less loneliness, better coping strategies, less depression, less irritability and less risk of chronic disease when they are plugged into those family and friends and other sorts of community-based support systems."

Communication Relieves Stress

For Jillian and Philip Downs, whose daughter has cystic fibrosis, say that support comes from a network of cystic fibrosis care centers and local groups that raise funds for a cure. But perhaps most importantly, they support each other.

Philip says they haven't figured out the magic formula for managing stress, but that communication is a big part of it. We have, I think, a common sense approach where my happiness is dependent on her happiness.

So if she's stressed out, I know that I am not going to be at my best. So we need to communicate that and try to support each other the best way we can.

Jillian says they are lucky. "We don't disagree about what we need to do for Ava and ourselves."

With Ava's chronic illness and, now, the prospect of a new baby on the way, the Downs know their stresses are far from over. But they are confident they will make it through.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

VOA News: USA: Jury Convicts Bosnian-born US Citizen in NYC Subway Bombing Plot

VOA News: USA
USA Voice of America
Jury Convicts Bosnian-born US Citizen in NYC Subway Bombing Plot
May 1st 2012, 19:44

A federal jury in New York on Tuesday convicted a Bosnian-born U.S. citizen of nine counts of terrorism in connection with an aborted subway suicide bombing plot in 2009.

Defense lawyers for Adis Medunjanin argued that he had renounced a plot with two former high school friends, Najibullah Zazi and Zarein Ahmedzay, to detonate bombs in crowded New York City subways.

Zazi and Ahmedzay, both of Afghan descent, testified against their friend in exchange for possible leniency in sentencing.  They said Medunjanin had suggested an attack during Ramadan, on September 11, 2009.

They said the trio, all devout Muslims, traveled to Pakistan in 2008, intending to fight U.S. forces in Afghanistan, but ended up at an al-Qaida training camp, where they were urged to carry out a suicide bombing in the U.S.

The trial provided glimpses of the workings of al-Qaida, when two other convicted terrorists gave testimony.

Outside the courthouse, New Yorkers seemed unconcerned about the trial. "I'm not updated with the news, honestly," said one man.

"I don't have a fear and I don't have an opinion about that," said a woman outside the courthouse.   I just know if they're doing this, there's a reason."

Terrorism experts say the plot was narrowly averted when authorities became suspicious of Zazi's activities.

William Bratton, the former head of police for New York and Los Angeles, said, "Of the 14 incidents that have been thwarted here in New York since 9/11 [September 11, 2001], [this was] probably the most significant because it really was very similar to what was carried out in London, the idea of taking backpacks or taking suicide vests onto subway trains in New York City.  And it came very close to success."

Karen Greenberg, director of the Center on National Security at Fordham University Law School, says the case shows that terrorism trials are best conducted in public view, in civilian courts.

"I think the most important thing about this case was that it was tried, that it was tried without a lot of criticism from any of the participants.  Everybody agreed on the rules, on the procedures, on the safety concerns, on the evidentiary thresholds.  And it was a case in which both the prosecution and the defense felt they were using their skills to try a case that fit within the federal courts," she said.

Medunjanin, a former high school football player and college graduate, did not testify at his trial.  He faces a maximum sentence of life in prison.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

VOA News: Middle East: No Softening on Iran: Israeli Defense Minister

VOA News: Middle East
Middle East Voice of America
No Softening on Iran: Israeli Defense Minister
May 1st 2012, 19:03

Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak is maintaining the government's hard line against Iran's nuclear program, saying Israel will not be duped by negotiations, and warning that an attack is not out of the question. But leaders of Israel's security services have expressed strong reservations about the effectiveness of a military strike against Iran, and its repercussions.

On Monday, Barak acknowledged that stiff new sanctions against Iran helped restart talks between Iran and the group of six world powers known as the P-5 +1 - Russia, China, Britain, France, Germany and the United States.

"Today sanctions are stronger than ever," said Barak. "They forced the Iranians to take note, to sit down and to talk. The P-5+1 engagement of Iran, however, does not fill me with confidence. I may sound pessimistic, but the State of Israel cannot afford to be duped."

Barak also accused the Iranian government of seeking to buy time to make its alleged nuclear weapons program immune from military attacks.

The defense minister has been one of the strongest supporters of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's hardline position against Iran's nuclear activities, which Israel believes are aimed at making nuclear weapons.

But leaders of Israel's security services have expressed strong reservations about whether military action would be effective in stopping Iran's suspect activities.

Western powers lately have suggested that Iran be allowed to retain enough uranium enrichment capabilities to support nuclear medicine and generation of electrical power.  They see a military strike as the last option.

Barak told foreign journalists in Jerusalem that in his view, Iran is not to be trusted.

"Iranian deception and lies concerning their nuclear program have been on-going and well-documented," said Barak.  "Yet parts of the world, including some politically motivated Israeli figures, prefer to bury their heads in sand."

Iran has pledged to retaliate for any attack.  But Barak said as long as Tehran maintains what he called its goal of destroying the Israeli state and supports international terrorism, it must be prevented from becoming a nuclear power.

"A military option is not a simple one," Barak added.  "It will be complicated with certain associated risks. But a radical Islamic Republic of Iran with nuclear weapons would be far more dangerous both to the region and, indeed, to the whole world."

He said his primary responsibility as defense minister is to ensure that Israel's fate remains in its own hands.

Still, some Israelis prefer to wait and see. Sanctions should be given a chance, said Eitan Livne, nn Iran analyst in Israel.

"Sanctions are meant to make the last resort, the military option, unnecessary. So before we admit that sanctions have failed we must give them a real try," he said.

If the sanctions fail, Livne said, the international community should then reassess its strategy.

But political analysts note that Israel appears to be entering an election campaign period. Many opposition leaders have begun calling for the dissolution of parliament and elections within the next six months.

Hebrew University Professor Abraham Diskin said as a result, the issue of whether to attack Iran is likely to be placed on a back burner as candidates and voters focus on domestic issues.

"I don't think any move of Israel is going to be decided according to domestic or electoral consideration. It's too heavy of an issue. It's too existential on the one hand and the risk is too heavy on the other hand," said Diskin.

And he said although a military attack might provide a temporary boost to political leaders, they are not likely to undertake such a risky foreign mission during an electoral campaign.

Finally, the U.S. presidential campaign is also affecting the possibility of a military strike on Iran.

Public opinion polls have shown that less than half of the Israeli public supports an independent strike against Iran, while nearly three-fourths support a strike with U.S. backing.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

VOA News: Europe: Jury Convicts Bosnian-born US Citizen in NYC Subway Bombing Plot

VOA News: Europe
Europe Voice of America
Jury Convicts Bosnian-born US Citizen in NYC Subway Bombing Plot
May 1st 2012, 19:44

A federal jury in New York on Tuesday convicted a Bosnian-born U.S. citizen of nine counts of terrorism in connection with an aborted subway suicide bombing plot in 2009.

Defense lawyers for Adis Medunjanin argued that he had renounced a plot with two former high school friends, Najibullah Zazi and Zarein Ahmedzay, to detonate bombs in crowded New York City subways.

Zazi and Ahmedzay, both of Afghan descent, testified against their friend in exchange for possible leniency in sentencing.  They said Medunjanin had suggested an attack during Ramadan, on September 11, 2009.

They said the trio, all devout Muslims, traveled to Pakistan in 2008, intending to fight U.S. forces in Afghanistan, but ended up at an al-Qaida training camp, where they were urged to carry out a suicide bombing in the U.S.

The trial provided glimpses of the workings of al-Qaida, when two other convicted terrorists gave testimony.

Outside the courthouse, New Yorkers seemed unconcerned about the trial. "I'm not updated with the news, honestly," said one man.

"I don't have a fear and I don't have an opinion about that," said a woman outside the courthouse.   I just know if they're doing this, there's a reason."

Terrorism experts say the plot was narrowly averted when authorities became suspicious of Zazi's activities.

William Bratton, the former head of police for New York and Los Angeles, said, "Of the 14 incidents that have been thwarted here in New York since 9/11 [September 11, 2001], [this was] probably the most significant because it really was very similar to what was carried out in London, the idea of taking backpacks or taking suicide vests onto subway trains in New York City.  And it came very close to success."

Karen Greenberg, director of the Center on National Security at Fordham University Law School, says the case shows that terrorism trials are best conducted in public view, in civilian courts.

"I think the most important thing about this case was that it was tried, that it was tried without a lot of criticism from any of the participants.  Everybody agreed on the rules, on the procedures, on the safety concerns, on the evidentiary thresholds.  And it was a case in which both the prosecution and the defense felt they were using their skills to try a case that fit within the federal courts," she said.

Medunjanin, a former high school football player and college graduate, did not testify at his trial.  He faces a maximum sentence of life in prison.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

VOA News: Asia: Obama Arrives in Afghanistan to Mark bin Laden Death Anniversary

VOA News: Asia
Asia Voice of America
Obama Arrives in Afghanistan to Mark bin Laden Death Anniversary
May 1st 2012, 19:22

U.S. President Barack Obama has arrived in Afghanistan on a secret trip to mark the first anniversary of the killing of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden.

Mr. Obama is expected to sign a strategic partnership agreement setting conditions for a U.S. presence there after a 2014 deadline for the withdrawal of most NATO combat forces.

The whirlwind visit will culminate with a live, televised address to the American people.

Some information for this report was provided by AP, AFP and Reuters.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

VOA News: USA: US Judge Rejects 'Immunity' for Former IMF Chief

VOA News: USA
USA Voice of America
US Judge Rejects 'Immunity' for Former IMF Chief
May 1st 2012, 18:02

The former head of the International Monetary Fund will have to appear in court in connection with allegations he tried to rape a hotel maid in New York.

A U.S. judge Tuesday rejected a motion by Dominique Strauss-Kahn to have the lawsuit thrown out on the grounds he has diplomatic immunity.

Bronx state Supreme Court Justice Douglas McKeon ruled the French politician cannot claim immunity from the civil suit filed by New York hotel maid Nafisatou Diallo because he did not claim immunity following his arrest last May. The judge said Strauss-Kahn further undermined any claim to immunity by resigning shortly after the alleged incident became public.

Diallo said Strauss-Kahn tried to rape her in his Manhattan hotel suite, but prosecutors dropped criminal charges last summer, citing doubts about Diallo's credibility.

Diallo then filed suit against Strauss-Kahn in civil court. Strauss-Kahn has denied doing anything violent during the encounter with Diallo.

Strauss-Kahn's attorney, Amit Mehta, had argued that an IMF chief enjoys the same diplomatic immunity as a French ambassador. Mehta argued that executives of the international agencies such as the IMF and the United Nations need immunity from prosecution so that these agencies can function properly.

Diallo's lawyers said the immunity claim relies on a U.N. agreement the U.S. did not sign.

In March, the former IMF chief was charged with pimping as part of organized crime in France. His French lawyers said Strauss-Kahn is being hounded for his libertine ways.  The Socialist politician was once considered a top rival to President Nicolas Sarkozy in the French presidential election.

Some information for this report was provided by AP, AFP and Reuters.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

VOA News: Europe: US Judge Rejects 'Immunity' for Former IMF Chief

VOA News: Europe
Europe Voice of America
US Judge Rejects 'Immunity' for Former IMF Chief
May 1st 2012, 18:02

The former head of the International Monetary Fund will have to appear in court in connection with allegations he tried to rape a hotel maid in New York.

A U.S. judge Tuesday rejected a motion by Dominique Strauss-Kahn to have the lawsuit thrown out on the grounds he has diplomatic immunity.

Bronx state Supreme Court Justice Douglas McKeon ruled the French politician cannot claim immunity from the civil suit filed by New York hotel maid Nafisatou Diallo because he did not claim immunity following his arrest last May. The judge said Strauss-Kahn further undermined any claim to immunity by resigning shortly after the alleged incident became public.

Diallo said Strauss-Kahn tried to rape her in his Manhattan hotel suite, but prosecutors dropped criminal charges last summer, citing doubts about Diallo's credibility.

Diallo then filed suit against Strauss-Kahn in civil court. Strauss-Kahn has denied doing anything violent during the encounter with Diallo.

Strauss-Kahn's attorney, Amit Mehta, had argued that an IMF chief enjoys the same diplomatic immunity as a French ambassador. Mehta argued that executives of the international agencies such as the IMF and the United Nations need immunity from prosecution so that these agencies can function properly.

Diallo's lawyers said the immunity claim relies on a U.N. agreement the U.S. did not sign.

In March, the former IMF chief was charged with pimping as part of organized crime in France. His French lawyers said Strauss-Kahn is being hounded for his libertine ways.  The Socialist politician was once considered a top rival to President Nicolas Sarkozy in the French presidential election.

Some information for this report was provided by AP, AFP and Reuters.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

VOA News: Africa: IOM: Deadline to Repatriate Thousands of South Sudanese Unrealistic

VOA News: Africa
Africa Voice of America
IOM: Deadline to Repatriate Thousands of South Sudanese Unrealistic
May 1st 2012, 17:41

The International Organization for Migration is urging authorities in Sudan's White Nile State to extend a Saturday deadline for repatriating 12,000 to 15,000 South Sudanese nationals.  IOM says it is not possible to transport such a large number of people from Kosti to their homes in South Sudan by May 5.

The agency says it is concerned by the announcement of the governor of Sudan's White Nile state that thousands of South Sudanese waiting for transport home must leave in less than a week.  

IOM spokesman Jean-Philippe Chauzy says many of the South Sudanese are at the Kosti way station, 200 kilometers south of the Sudanese capital, Khartoum.

"Should the authorities in the White Nile state decide to push people across the border into South Sudan, we are concerned that this would be extremely detrimental to very vulnerable groups of people who have been waiting for weeks and months in Kosti, who are heavily dependent on the humanitarian assistance that we and other agencies are providing.… And, the fact that we are now given a 5th of May deadline raises alarm bells in as much as we simply cannot organize all the humanitarian returns of those South Sudanese from Kosti," Chauzy said.  

Another factor complicating the return is the fighting between Sudan and South Sudan along their border, which has raised fears the countries will slip into all-out war.  Sudan declared a state of emergency along the border this week, while the south on Tuesday accused Sudanese troops and militia of launching new attacks in Unity state.

Chauzy says the governor of White Nile State justifies his decision to rid Kosti of its displaced on security grounds.  The IOM spokesman says the clashes clearly have raised tensions.  But, he says the thousands of people in Kosti are civilians, who pose no security threat.

The spokesman says they are people desperate to get home, but who have no means to pay for their own transport.  He says they are people who cannot fend for themselves.  They are dependent upon the international community for food, water, health care and other essential services.

Chauzy says IOM's repatriation operation faces enormous logistical challenges.

<!--IMAGE-LEFT-->"Kosti is on the Nile.  Returns are taking place on the Nile, have taken place on the Nile using barges.  At the moment, we have great difficulties, obviously, getting those barges, getting the fuel to operate the barges and more fundamentally, we have not yet received a firm green light from the authorities in Khartoum to resume return operations along the Nile from Kosti towards Malakal and Juba, which are both in South Sudan," Chauzy said.  

Chauzy says IOM is looking at alternative solutions to return the South Sudanese.  He says one possibility is to bring the most vulnerable people back to Khartoum and, if it can get the funding, fly them to South Sudan.

He says another alternative is to take the displaced to Renk, another town along the White Nile in South Sudan.  However, he says that solution is far from ideal because there are more than 20,000 other South Sudanese who already have returned there.  He says adding 15,000 more people to that population would create an unsustainable situation.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

VOA News: USA: US Arrests 5 in Plot to Bomb Ohio Bridge

VOA News: USA
USA Voice of America
US Arrests 5 in Plot to Bomb Ohio Bridge
May 1st 2012, 17:12

Five men have been arrested by federal authorities for allegedly plotting to blow up a bridge near the U.S. city of Cleveland, Ohio.

Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Cleveland division, Stephen Anthony, says the five were taken into custody late Monday, after they attempted to remotely detonate devices they bought from undercover FBI agents.

"The individuals explored the illegal purchase of explosives, as well as the concept of using precursor chemicals and Internet knowledge to make homemade explosives.  They ultimately negotiated with FBI undercover agents and purchased two inert, I say inert, improvised explosive devices, IEDs, which were presented as C-4-based remote-activated IEDs," Anthony said.

A criminal complaint filed in the U.S. District Court in Cleveland identifies three of the suspects as "self-proclaimed anarchists."  Authorities say the men had considered a series of evolving plots over several months.

The complaint says the initial plot involved using smoke grenades to distract law enforcement so that the suspects could topple financial institution signs on top of buildings in downtown Cleveland.  Later, the plot reportedly grew to include remotely detonating C-4 explosives.  The final plan identified a bridge near Cleveland as the target.

Authorities say the plot is not connected to the one-year anniversary of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden's death.

Some information for this report was provided by AP and Reuters.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

VOA News: USA: Obama Denies Politicizing Bin Laden Raid

VOA News: USA
USA Voice of America
Obama Denies Politicizing Bin Laden Raid
May 1st 2012, 16:52

U.S. President Barack Obama says his administration is not politicizing the raid that killed Osama bin Laden, pushing back on criticism that the White House is indulging in "excessive celebration" over the terrorist leader's death.

Speaking days before the first anniversary of the U.S. commando raid in Pakistan that killed the al-Qaida leader, Obama said Monday that there are others - an apparent reference to his presumed Republican challenger in the November election - who have reversed position on going ahead with such a mission.

Without mentioning Mitt Romney by name, Obama recommended looking at people's previous statements on the issue. Romney said several years ago that it was not worth a tremendous, costly effort to go after one person, but on Monday said "of course" he would have ordered bin Laden killed.
<!--IMAGE-LEFT-->

"I said that I would go after bin Laden if we had a clear shot at him and I did. If there are others who have said one thing and now suggest they'd do something else, then I'd go ahead and let them explain it," Obama reiterated during a White House news conference.

Marking the one-year anniversary, Obama will be featured in a NBC TV news special Wednesday that includes an interview in the White House Situation Room where he and his top aides watched the raid on bin Laden's compound unfold live.

The bin Laden raid and drone strikes have hurt U.S. relations with Pakistan.

On Monday, Obama's counterterrorism adviser defended the use of unmanned aerial strikes against terrorism suspects overseas, in the administration's first such detailed public comments on the controversial program.

John Brennan said the "targeted strikes are legal,'' citing U.S. law and noting that the United States is in an armed conflict with al-Qaida, the Taliban and other associated forces in response to the al-Qaida terror attacks of September 11, 2001.

The killing of suspected militants, including American citizens overseas, by U.S. drones has been criticized by human rights and civil liberties groups. The American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit earlier this year seeking Justice Department memos justifying the targeted killings.

Watch related video
<!--AV-->

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions