Monday, April 23, 2012

VOA News: USA: Obama Unveils Sanctions, Touts Anti-Atrocity Measures

VOA News: USA
USA Voice of America
Obama Unveils Sanctions, Touts Anti-Atrocity Measures
Apr 23rd 2012, 19:57

President Barack Obama is taking new steps designed to strengthen the U.S. government's ability to detect and respond to mass atrocities and human-rights abuses around the world.

Obama announced the human-rights actions, formalized in an executive order and notifications to Congress, as he made his second visit to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington.

Last year, the White House announced a comprehensive strategy that identified the prevention of mass atrocities and genocide as a core national security interest and moral responsibility of the United States.

A new Atrocities Prevention Board, formed in 2011, was to meet for the first time Monday at the White House.

Obama said U.S. government agencies will for the first time produce a National Intelligence Estimate aimed at assessing the potential for mass killings in countries around the world.

The president called these and other steps part of "institutionalizing" how the U.S. government mobilizes and uses tools to prevent mass atrocities and genocide.

"We need to be doing everything we can to prevent and respond to these kind of atrocities," he said. "Because national sovereignty is never a license to slaughter your people."

Obama listed steps his administration took to deal with various situations, including the U.S. and allied operation in Libya that he said helped save innocent lives.

He also mentioned diplomacy to stop fighting that threatened last year's independence referendum for South Sudan, steps to end upheaval in Ivory Coast, and his sending of U.S. military advisers to help efforts against the Lord's Resistance Army in central Africa.

Announces sanctions
Obama said the situation in Syria shows the U.S. and those working to prevent atrocities cannot "control every event," but that the U.S. will continue to work with allies and partners to pressure and isolate Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. He announced new sanctions against the Syrian and Iranian governments to help prevent them from using Internet- and phone-monitoring technologies to track and target people for attack.

"These technologies should be in place to empower citizens, not to repress them," he said. "It is one more step that we can take toward the day that we know will come -- the end of the Assad regime that has brutalized the Syrian people and allow the Syrian people to chart their own destiny."

The president's remarks at the museum marked the annual remembrance of the Holocaust.

Survivors, Jewish community leaders, and human-rights activists were among those present.

Obama also used his remarks about the Holocaust to reiterate strong U.S. support for Israel in the face of threats from Iran.

He said when faced with a regime that threatens global security, denies the Holocaust, and threatens to destroy Israel, the U.S. will do everything in its power to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.

Obama was introduced by Nobel Peace Prize laureate and Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel with whom he toured the Buchenwald concentration camp site in Germany in 2009.

"The greatest tragedy in history could have been prevented had the civilized world spoken up, taken measures," Wiesel said.

Obama announced that he will award the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest award to a civilian, to the late Jan Karski, a former Polish officer who provided first-hand accounts of Nazi atrocities committed before and during World War II.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

VOA News: Middle East: Obama Unveils Sanctions, Touts Anti-Atrocity Measures

VOA News: Middle East
Middle East Voice of America
Obama Unveils Sanctions, Touts Anti-Atrocity Measures
Apr 23rd 2012, 19:57

President Barack Obama is taking new steps designed to strengthen the U.S. government's ability to detect and respond to mass atrocities and human-rights abuses around the world.

Obama announced the human-rights actions, formalized in an executive order and notifications to Congress, as he made his second visit to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington.

Last year, the White House announced a comprehensive strategy that identified the prevention of mass atrocities and genocide as a core national security interest and moral responsibility of the United States.

A new Atrocities Prevention Board, formed in 2011, was to meet for the first time Monday at the White House.

Obama said U.S. government agencies will for the first time produce a National Intelligence Estimate aimed at assessing the potential for mass killings in countries around the world.

The president called these and other steps part of "institutionalizing" how the U.S. government mobilizes and uses tools to prevent mass atrocities and genocide.

"We need to be doing everything we can to prevent and respond to these kind of atrocities," he said. "Because national sovereignty is never a license to slaughter your people."

Obama listed steps his administration took to deal with various situations, including the U.S. and allied operation in Libya that he said helped save innocent lives.

He also mentioned diplomacy to stop fighting that threatened last year's independence referendum for South Sudan, steps to end upheaval in Ivory Coast, and his sending of U.S. military advisers to help efforts against the Lord's Resistance Army in central Africa.

Announces sanctions
Obama said the situation in Syria shows the U.S. and those working to prevent atrocities cannot "control every event," but that the U.S. will continue to work with allies and partners to pressure and isolate Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. He announced new sanctions against the Syrian and Iranian governments to help prevent them from using Internet- and phone-monitoring technologies to track and target people for attack.

"These technologies should be in place to empower citizens, not to repress them," he said. "It is one more step that we can take toward the day that we know will come -- the end of the Assad regime that has brutalized the Syrian people and allow the Syrian people to chart their own destiny."

The president's remarks at the museum marked the annual remembrance of the Holocaust.

Survivors, Jewish community leaders, and human-rights activists were among those present.

Obama also used his remarks about the Holocaust to reiterate strong U.S. support for Israel in the face of threats from Iran.

He said when faced with a regime that threatens global security, denies the Holocaust, and threatens to destroy Israel, the U.S. will do everything in its power to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.

Obama was introduced by Nobel Peace Prize laureate and Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel with whom he toured the Buchenwald concentration camp site in Germany in 2009.

"The greatest tragedy in history could have been prevented had the civilized world spoken up, taken measures," Wiesel said.

Obama announced that he will award the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest award to a civilian, to the late Jan Karski, a former Polish officer who provided first-hand accounts of Nazi atrocities committed before and during World War II.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

VOA News: Africa: Ouattara Has Message of Reconciliation One Year Later

VOA News: Africa
Africa Voice of America
Ouattara Has Message of Reconciliation One Year Later
Apr 23rd 2012, 18:59

Ivory Coast President Alassane Ouattara is taking a message of reconciliation to towns still affected by last year's violent transfer of power.  On Monday he visited Duekoue, where hundreds of people were killed allegedly by his supporters during the armed struggle that ensued when former president Laurent Gbagbo refused to give up power after losing an election.  President Ouattara spoke of unity and promised development.

President Alassane Ouattara arrived to a warm welcome in Duekoue and the rest of the western region, bearing new Toyota SUVs, $500,000 for the districts and promises to end all power outages and water cuts by the end of the year.   

His plan, coupled with a message of reconciliation, may be winning over Ivorians who opposed his election.

In the isolated town of Toulepleu, where the majority of the population is from the Guere ethnic group, which overwhelmingly supported former president Laurent Gbagbo,  Mr. Ouattara's promises were received with applause.

"I can tell you, yes, I can tell you that for the road from Toulepleu, Bloquin, we're finished the research, and the road will be paved before the end of my term."

Fifty-year-old farmer Anderson Kele in Toulepleu sits under a tree sipping tea and talking with his friend who he lived with in Liberia for one year as a refugee.  He says he was apprehensive when the president's security forces arrived in Toulepleu a couple of days before the president's arrival.

He says when he saw the soldiers arrive, it resembled the arrival of the rebels last year.  He says they were afraid and had fear in their hearts, but in the end no one was threatened.  He believes now that you have to put your confidence in the winner, and he thinks the population in Toulepleu supports Mr. Ouattara now.

In each town the president visits, development promises are coupled with words of reconciliation.  His new mantra is that he is the president of all Ivorians and he is asking for all ethnic and religious groups to work with him to build a stable and united future.

"In order for there to be reconciliation, there needs to be forgiveness, but there also needs to be repentance. I ask all of those among you, all of we Ivoirians, in whatever manner it happened, that those of us who have carried out misdeeds, we admit them to the justice system," he said.

But not everyone is so quick to accept the president's message.

During the president's visit in Duekoue Monday, site of a notorious massacre in the Carrefour  neighborhood by what human rights groups says were pro Ouattara fighters, some say they are still unsettled.

Constance Bohe, a leader of one group of returnees, says people here still do not have the truth, and there hasn't been any justice for the perpetrators.

He says it's not normal for the neighborhood to undergo a massacre and then to not have the truth, to move on without knowing what happened and who did what.  He says the neighborhood has not seen any concrete action from the justice system other than visits by some government and International Criminal Court investigators.

The government's commission of inquiry and the ICC are still investigating post-election crimes in Ivory Coast.  The United Nations estimates more than 3,000 people died in the 2011 post-election ethnic violence.  So far, no one who supported President Ouattara has been charged.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

VOA News: USA: Arizona Deeply Divided Over Immigration Law Before Supreme Court

VOA News: USA
USA Voice of America
Arizona Deeply Divided Over Immigration Law Before Supreme Court
Apr 23rd 2012, 19:21

On Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments over Arizona's controversial state immigration enforcement law. The government maintains that immigration is a federal matter and that states cannot have their own separate laws, whereas defenders of the state law say it was made necessary by the federal government's failure to secure the border with Mexico. The issue has deeply divided the state's citizens.

Every morning, around a dozen men gather in a Phoenix parking lot, hoping local residents will hire them for day jobs in landscaping or construction.

After state law SB1070 was passed two years ago, thousands of illegal immigrants left Arizona, fearing local police would now be able to detain them.

But these men from Mexico say they are not concerned, that they have to work in order to live and they do not want to leave.

Two years ago, there were massive protests on the streets of Phoenix and many Hispanics said the law would allow police to target anyone who looked Mexican,  including legal residents and citizens.

A federal court blocked that part of the law, but the state appealed, and now the nation's highest court will consider whether it is constitutional.

One of the attorneys who helped bring the case against the law is Daniel Ortega, Jr.. "I think what you have here is the potential for people of certain color of skin or people of certain hair or certain accents being subject to greater scrutiny," he said.

But aside from the issue of racial profiling, Ortega says immigration is a federal matter. "When you allow states to enact their own laws, you will have - first of all - a patchwork of many laws, none of which are uniform," he said.

But SB1070's main sponsor, former Arizona state senator Russell Pearce, disagrees. "States have inherent constitutional police powers; they have never been preempted from enforcing these laws. The only impediment to enforcing these laws is political," he said.

Pearce also had personal reasons for wanting this law. In 2004, his son Sean, a deputy sheriff, was wounded in a gun battle with a criminal who was in the country illegally. "Who I am mad at, who I am really upset with, is my government. That should not have happened," he said.

Although some Arizona law enforcers spoke out against SB1070, the law was strongly backed by Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio. "We enforce gun laws, we enforce drug laws, we enforce bank robbery laws, so why should this be any different," he said.

Civil Rights activists claim that Arpaio already uses racial profiling, something he denies. He says the flow of illegal immigrants and drugs over the border is the real problem.

On the streets of Phoenix, there are mixed opinions about the law and the man generally known here as Sheriff Joe. "The federal government was supposed to be taking care of this, but they have not been, so now the state has to step in," said one woman.

"I come from Los Angeles, California where the crime rate is, whew, out of control, so I think the Phoenix crime rate is pretty good right now, thanks to Sheriff Joe," said one man.

"Arizona is a very racist state, let's be honest, and I feel they should not be able to have their own law," said a woman with an opposing view.

Although Russell Pearce was removed from office in a recall election last year, he feels vindicated by what other states are now doing. "Thirty-four states are writing legislation modeled after SB1070. Now, many of them are on hold, waiting for the Supreme Court, but Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina have passed such legislation," he said.

Pearce thinks the Supreme Court will uphold the law, but opponent Daniel Ortega says that would anger Hispanics here. "If the court decides it will lift the injunction on SB1070 and allow it to be implemented, there will be a very large reaction from the Latino community," he said.

The immigration issue has left this state deeply divided, so no matter how the Supreme Court ultimately rules, many people will be angry and disappointed.

Media files:
ap_arizona_immigration_law_300_eng_23apr12.jpg (image/jpeg, 0.1 MB)
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

VOA News: USA: Romney Begins Vice Presidential Search

VOA News: USA
USA Voice of America
Romney Begins Vice Presidential Search
Apr 23rd 2012, 19:32

Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney has begun the search for a vice presidential running mate, a decision expected sometime before the Republican Party's national nominating convention in Tampa, Florida, in late August.

With his Republican rivals either out of the race or low on money, Mitt Romney now seems to be on a glide path toward the Republican presidential nomination.

Romney is increasingly turning his attention to President Barack Obama.

"This man is out of ideas, he is out of excuses, and in 2012 we are going to make sure he gets put out of office!," Romney said.

Romney's first major decision will be to select a vice presidential running mate, and one of those expected to be on his short list of candidates is Senator Marco Rubio of Florida.

Rubio says he would be flattered to be asked, but he says the answer is no.

"Because I'm enjoying my service in the Senate," Rubio said. "I don't want to be the vice president right now or maybe ever."

Other possible contenders include Representative Paul Ryan of Wisconsin and New Jersey Governor Chris Christie. But Christie also says he is not interested.

"But he knows it is not my desire, my lifelong wish, to be vice president of the United States," Christie said.

Romney's choice is important, says former Reagan Chief of Staff Ken Duberstein.

"Whoever a presidential nominee selects as vice president, as his nominee, that is the first major judgment that the American people see about that presidential candidate," Duberstein said.

Four years ago, Republican John McCain's decision to pick Alaska Governor Sarah Palin hurt him with independent voters, something Romney is likely to try to avoid, says Duberstein.

"In light of 2008, Governor Romney, I think, will go with somebody who everybody will perceive can step in and be president in a heartbeat.  If you are going to select somebody as one step away from the presidency, that person has to be prepared to be president on the very first day," he said.

Historically, vice presidential running mates are not major factors in presidential elections.

But they can offer small advantages, says political analyst Rhodes Cook.

"It can be important more in terms of, say, a certain state.  If there is someone who can help bring you a major state, be it Florida, Ohio, Michigan, something like that.  Then yes, it could make a difference," Cook said.

Romney is expected to secure the number of delegates he needs for the Republican nomination in June, but the search for a running mate is expected to take longer.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

VOA News: Economy: Hollywood Studios Lose Australian Internet Piracy Case

VOA News: Economy
Economy Voice of America
Hollywood Studios Lose Australian Internet Piracy Case
Apr 23rd 2012, 18:57

Some of Hollywood's biggest film studios have failed in an attempt to stem the flow of illegal video downloads when they lost a landmark appeal against an Australian Internet provider. A group of international and Australian companies alleged that Perth-based iiNet authorized the infringement of their copyright when its customers downloaded movies and television programs. Their claims have been dismissed by Australia's High Court. 

Case against piracy

The case brought by 34 American and Australian film, television and music companies, including Warner Bros, Disney and 20th Century Fox, was seen as an ambitious attempt to force Internet service providers to act against piracy.

The entertainment industry claimed that iiNet, Australia's third-largest ISP, should be punished for illegal video downloads made by its customers. In 2010, Australia's Federal Court said companies like iiNet could not be held accountable for Internet piracy.

The 2010 ruling marked the first time a court had ruled on whether an ISP could be held responsible for copyright violations by its users.

Appeal thrown out by high court

But the Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft insisted the judgment set a dangerous precedent that allowed ISPs to ignore the widespread plundering of online material. Its appeal has been thrown out by Australia's highest court but its managing director, Neil Gane, hopes that tougher anti-piracy laws will soon follow.

"We are disappointed by today's decision. You know the judges in the High Court have, you know, unanimously recognized that legislative change is now required to deal with the widespread copyright infringements that are occurring across Australian networks," said Gane.

Film industry to pursue other methods


The global film and television industry says it is now pursuing other avenues, including targeting software developers who help Internet users watch illegally downloaded videos.

Michael Malone, the chief executive of iiNet, insists that the best way to protect copyright is to ensure that lawful, online content is cheaper and made available far more quickly.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

VOA News: Africa: Northern Ugandans Fight to Reclaim Their Land

VOA News: Africa
Africa Voice of America
Northern Ugandans Fight to Reclaim Their Land
Apr 23rd 2012, 17:34

The rebel Lord's Resistance Army and its leader, Joseph Kony, have moved into neighboring countries, but in Uganda, the 20-year war Kony waged has left a host of problems in its wake.

The people of northern Uganda are gradually emerging from a brutal 20-year war with Joseph Kony and the LRA, who were driven out of the country in 2006.  But now, tens of thousands of people are finding themselves caught in a new kind of war -- this time to reclaim their own land.

During the war, about two million people were forced into camps for internally displaced persons, or IDPs.  The camps are now officially closed, but when the people tried to go home, many found their ancestral land was occupied, or had been sold off.

Northern Uganda is home to the Acholi people.  Steven Oola, a lawyer with the Kampala-based Refugee Law Project, says that in Acholi culture, land is collectively owned by the tribe or clan and cannot be sold.

"There was no commercialization of land, so there was no risk that someone else would come and buy your land.  Before the conflict, there was no land sale in Acholi land.  So people didn't anticipate land would be a contentious issue," Oola said.

But land has been a very contentious issue indeed.  Part of the problem, says Oola, is that some people in the camps had sold their land.  Others had forgotten where their traditional boundaries lay. But some of the land belonging to IDPs was the target of very deliberate land grabs.

Julian Hopwood, a land rights researcher for a local non-governmental organization, says that in some cases, members of the Ugandan military were involved.

"There's many reports that senior figures in the military and others used displacement as an opportunity to acquire land, by means that may or may not have been technically legal," Hopwood said.

In one high-profile case, the Ugandan government has been trying to allocate land to investors looking to plant a sugarcane plantation.

But for Jackie Aciro, the problem lies with her own family.

Aciro works as a housekeeper in Gulu, where she rents two tiny rooms with her husband and children.  She longs to be able to work her husband's land, but he is a war orphan who grew up in an IDP camp.  When he tried to go home, he found his uncles had occupied the land and refused to allow him to cultivate there.

Aciro says she is worried about what this means for her family, particularly her son.

"If a father has no land, then a child also will have no land.  For boys, you get married and your children also remain in that land.  So if your father has no land, it's not possible.  Here in northern Uganda, the important thing is that you're supposed to be with land," Aciro said.

Tens of thousands of people in northern Uganda are in similar situations.  Some have taken the matter to court.  Others moved into cities.   But Oola says that for many others, the solution was simply to stay in the camps.  Trying to re-claim your property, he says, can be a dangerous affair.

"They started fighting, there was a lot of spearing, a lot of killing, a lot of tension, basically, brewing within the communities.  We found some people were still in the camps because they tried to go back home, and they found that land was just too hot an issue.  It's a matter of life and deat," Oola said.

<!--IMAGE-LEFT-->

Antony Odiya agrees.  A local man involved in a land dispute of his own, he says that people often take the law into their own hands.

"Last week, there was a land wrangle between a neighbor.  That neighbor planned to buy petrol, and then pour on the wall and the roof of the house, and then they burned those people inside the house.  Three people died," Odiya said.

Odiya's land is being occupied by IDPs who have nowhere to go, and refuse to leave.  He is renting a small house in Gulu for his wife and five children, but he says it is difficult there to make ends meet.

Land rights researcher Hopwood says the cities of northern Uganda are filled with landless people, and that many are barely able to survive.

"Gulu and Kitgum, particularly Gulu, have large populations of people on the economic margins.  Some reports say the sex industry up here is substantial.  And it seems to be the case that they are people who are unable to live on their land and access their land," Hopwood said.

Aciro is hoping to buy a small plot of land in Gulu itself, where she can grow corn, cassava and sweet potatoes to feed her family.  But, she says, losing her husband's land has left her feeling helpless and confused.

"Show us our own land, the one for our father.  We don't want to farm any other land, but we want to see the one which belongs to our father.  So right now I'm confused.  I don't know where to stand, or where to begin, where it's going to end up," Aciro said.

The Ugandan government is trying to solve the problem by issuing certificates for the land, which would clearly identify the owner.  But Oola says that by making land easier to buy and sell, this goes against Acholi tradition, and only promises to make matters worse.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

VOA News: Africa: Report: Palm Oil Project Hurts Land, Residents in Uganda

VOA News: Africa
Africa Voice of America
Report: Palm Oil Project Hurts Land, Residents in Uganda
Apr 23rd 2012, 17:22

The environmental group Friends of the Earth-Uganda released a report Monday describing human rights violations and environmental destruction in pursuit of biofuels by a foreign joint venture. The report follows the planting of almost 10,000 hectares of palm oil plantations by BIDCO - an East African oilseed company - with World Bank and Ugandan government support.

The plantations are on islands that had been covered completely with forests, off the coast of Lake Victoria in Kalangala. The hectares that have been planted so far take up about one-quarter of the islands' land area.

The report says many farmers in the area were contracted initially to grow palm oil plants, but were forced to sell their land because of debts, low income from palm oil, and no food crops. Other farmers were chased off their land.

Unfulfilled promises

Frank Muramuzi, executive director of the National Association of Professional Environmentalists, said BIDCO Uganda promised area residents jobs and electricity.

"Most of the jobs are done by non-residents, the communities living in that area. They get people from Nairobi, they get people from Sudan, they get people from some other places," said Muramuzi. "So you find that those people who had been owning that land, who had been living on that land, they do not get the jobs. The other thing, you are telling people that they are going to get electricity, cheap electricity, and every household will be electrified. But when you go there, they do not have electricity."

He said the company violated a condition of the government's Environmental Impact Assessment that requires a 200-meter buffer zone between the shores of the lake and the project, with disastrous results.

"You are spraying the agro-chemicals, and they are going into the lake, and a result the fish are dying. These people have been for a long time living on fish - they have been fishermen and fisherwomen. These people no longer catch fish, and the fish that is there is contaminated," said Muramuzi.

The Ugandan government initiated its palm oil project in Kalangala district in 2002 with investors through a joint venture between the Wilmar Group of Malaysia, BIDCO Oil Refineries of Kenya, and another company. The joint venture resulted in the formation of BIDCO Uganda Limited and Oil Palm Uganda Limited.

Ugandan government defends deal

The $150-million project is the single largest foreign direct investment in Uganda. The Ugandan government says the project is expected to make the East African country fully self-sufficient in edible oils, saving $100 million in oil imports annually.

Ugandan government spokesman Fred Opoloti said he thinks BIDCO has been successful in employing local Ugandans, and that his government insisted on local job creation as a condition of investment.

"The number of people in the islands is quite great, and it would be unreasonable to expect BIDCO to employ all the people in the islands, but I know a great number of people have been employed," he said.

Opoloti said local residents will be getting electricity soon through a country-wide rural electrification program.

Environmental concerns

Regarding environmental issues, he said the project underwent a full environmental assessment before it began.

"The environmental department of government is closely monitoring the operations of BIDCO. If there is any sort of digression, government is certainly going to deal with it, and it is taking it absolutely seriously," said Opoloti.

At a meeting with investors on March 1, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni pledged an additional 8,000 hectares to enhance the project.

BIDCO managing director Kodey Rao was unavailable for comment. At the March 1 meeting, he said small-scale farmers would earn about $1,400 per acre per year from the cultivation of palm oil trees.

The report was released just before the convening of a World Bank conference on land and poverty. The project is receiving some funding from the World Bank.


You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

VOA News: Asia: Japan Pledges $7.4B in Aid for Mekong Region

VOA News: Asia
Asia Voice of America
Japan Pledges $7.4B in Aid for Mekong Region
Apr 23rd 2012, 17:28

Japan on Saturday pledged $7.4 billion in development aid over the next three years to Cambodia, Laos, Burma, Thailand and Vietnam, and also waived billions of dollars in Burmese debt.

The aid, directed at boosting infrastructure in the Mekong River region -- a resource-rich area where China is competing for influence -- was the result of meetings in Tokyo between leaders of the five countries.

Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda, who announced the pledge, says Japan set out 57 "flagship" projects focusing on development of ports, highways, power plants and high-speed railways worth an estimated $28 billion.

At the meetings, Thai Prime Minister Yingluk Shinawatra called for Japan's support in development of the $8.6 billion deep-sea port and industrial-estate development in Burma's Dawei southern region, a project led by Thai development and construction companies.

Japan provided a key boost to Burma's military-backed civilian government of President Thein Sein by saying it would begin taking steps to forgive $3.7 billion of the country's outstanding debt and said it was recommence suspended aid on condition the country continues moving ahead with political reforms.

Ian Storey, a fellow at the Institute for South East Asian Studies, says Japan's aid program highlights growing competition in development spending in the region.

"Of course there are three development projects going on at the same time -- the Chinese, the Japanese and the Lower Mekong Initiative, which is [a 2009 cooperative development agreement between these five countries and] the U.S. -- so there seems to be some competition among the three powers in this area," he says.

Kanae Doi, Japan director for Human Rights Watch, says Japan must use the newly announced financial arrangements to keep pressuring Burma on following through with political reforms.

"The Japanese government should maintain its leverage for the next three years before the next general election in 2015," she says, explaining that Tokyo should strategically reward Burma with a combination of aid stimulus and debt forgiveness upon making actual steps toward reform.

Japan's favorable policies toward Burma are likely to lead to a boost in Japanese investment in the country.

"We just want to make sure that these chances are used to the maximum extent," she says.

Meanwhile, the European Union on Monday announced a one-year suspension of a wide range of sanctions against Burma.

EU officials, who said they would retain an arms embargo, called for continued progress in the country's political reforms, an end to ethnic conflict and the release of all remaining political prisoners.

Media files:
AP120421110186.jpg
You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

VOA News: USA: US Supreme Court to Tackle Illegal Immigration

VOA News: USA
USA Voice of America
US Supreme Court to Tackle Illegal Immigration
Apr 23rd 2012, 17:25

The political and legal battle over how to deal with illegal immigration in the United States will be front and center before the Supreme Court on Wednesday.  The high court will consider whether an Arizona state law aimed at cracking down on illegal immigrants conflicts with the federal government's role in policing national borders. 

SB 1070 requires police to check the immigration status of people they detain and who they suspect may be in the country illegally.  The law also makes it a crime for illegal immigrants to work in the state.

The Obama administration has blocked several key provisions of the Arizona law in lower federal courts, asserting the responsibility to police the national borders rests with the federal government and Congress, not with individual states.

Opponents

Opponents of the law in Arizona also argue the statute has had a polarizing effect in the state.  

"I am a fourth generation Mexican-American from Arizona and I have never seen such division in our state," said Petra Falcon, a member of an activist group known as Promise Arizona, "and also the disbelief, anger and fear when SB 1070 [the bill] was signed [into law]."

Opponents also include leading Hispanic-American organizations like the National Council of La Raza.  Clarissa Martinez is director of immigration and national campaigns for the group.

"The United States is more than a country.  For many of us immigrants coming from other countries, it is an ideal and part of an aspiration," Martinez explained. "America has a proud immigration legacy, but it is not one without a tortured past."

Supporters of the Arizona law say the state was forced to act because the federal government failed to secure the border during a period of several years, resulting in about 400,000 illegal immigrants now living in the state.

Nationwide, it is estimated 11-million illegal immigrants reside in the United States.

Supporters

The Arizona law has many supporters around the country, including William Gheen in North Carolina, who heads a group called Americans for Legal Immigration Political Action Committee.

"Illegal immigration displaces and replaces American workers, students, people using health-care facilities," noted Gheen. "It results in the theft of hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars and some Americans lose their very lives because our borders go unenforced and our immigration laws go unenforced."

Several other states have enacted laws similar to the one in Arizona and will be closely watching the Supreme Court case.

Gheen says a high court decision to uphold the law would give states more leeway in cracking down on illegal immigration.

"We stand ready now for the Supreme Court to hopefully rule that states can enforce the existing immigration laws of the country when the federal government fails to do so and we will move immediately to try to pass that law in as many states as possible as rapidly as possible," Gheen said.

Decision

A Supreme Court ruling is expected by the end of June.  Whatever the court decides could have an impact on this year's presidential and congressional elections.  How to deal with illegal immigration remains a major political issue and affects the ability of both Democratic and Republican candidates to appeal to Hispanic voters.

Hispanics are the largest growing bloc of voters and public opinion polls show they are overwhelmingly against the Arizona law.


You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions